RESEARCH

Models that connect mechanisms
to material properties.

I study how physical mechanisms govern microstructures and their evolution, and how these changes affect material properties.

PHASE TRANSFORMATIONS

Microstructures in motion and beyond.

A material’s properties depend on the phases present, their size, shape and distribution, and the interfaces between them. During processing and service, phases form, grow, dissolve and coarsen, so the microstructure depends on temperature, time, loading and the initial state. I use phase-field models to calculate this evolution, including phase separation, precipitate growth, multivariant microstructures and ferroelectric domains. These models describe moving interfaces with smoothly varying fields, allowing boundaries to join or split without tracking each interface separately.

Phase-field equations and my earlier thesis work

For alloy microstructures, the total free energy contains bulk chemical, interfacial and elastic contributions. Conserved composition fields evolve through Cahn–Hilliard equations; nonconserved structural order parameters evolve through Allen–Cahn equations. Mechanical equilibrium determines the elastic fields produced by lattice misfit.

In my ferroelectrics work, polarization is the field that describes the magnitude and direction of the local electric dipole moment per unit volume. Its evolution follows a time-dependent Ginzburg–Landau equation. The free energy includes contributions from polarization, its spatial variation, elasticity and electric fields. Coupling between polarization and strain, together with mechanical equilibrium and electrostatics, allows us to calculate domain formation and switching under applied electric fields and mechanical constraints.

My master’s thesis examined ternary spinodal decomposition and the effect of relative interfacial energies on the formation and coarsening of three-phase microstructures. The three dimensionless mole fractions satisfy \(c_A+c_B+c_C=1\), so two composition fields are independent. The gradient-energy coefficients determine the energetic cost of composition gradients and influence the relative interfacial energies.

My PhD thesis examined a disordered matrix and three orientational variants of an ordered precipitate. The model uses one conserved composition field and three nonconserved structural order parameters. Each variant has a crystallographically related misfit-strain tensor. I studied how the magnitude and sign of its principal components affect precipitate shape, variant arrangement and coarsening. The model uses homogeneous, isotropic elastic constants; its anisotropy is in the misfit strain.

Doctoral theses I have guided on microstructural evolution

The following examples come from the doctoral research of my PhD students Sandeep, Tushar, Soumya and Pankaj. I jointly supervised Pankaj with Subhradeep Chatterjee. The images and movies show the results; the linked papers explain the models and calculations.

Sandeep Sugathan — phase separation in ternary alloys

A Phase-Field Study of Elastic Stress Effects on Phase Separation in Ternary Alloy Systems.

Sandeep and I studied how relative lattice misfits, interfacial energies and elastic anisotropy affect phase separation, phase arrangement and coarsening in ternary alloys. Related papers: elastic stress effects on ternary phase separation and elastic anisotropy.

Red cores with green shells in a blue matrix on the left; green precipitates with dissolved red cores on the right.
Core-shell precipitation in a ternary alloy. Red is the γ phase, green is the β phase, and blue is the α matrix. At the same dimensionless time, t = 4000, panel (a) retains core-shell precipitates; in panel (b), the cores dissolve because of the larger misfit between the two precipitate phases.Sandeep’s thesis, Fig. 4.43, p. 110. Select the image to view it at full size.

Core-shell precipitate growth

Red shows the γ cores, green shows the β shells, and blue shows the α matrix.

Core-shell precipitate growth. Shells form around the initial nuclei. The cores subsequently dissolve, leaving precipitates of the shell phase in the matrix.
Simulation parameters

Composition is expressed as dimensionless mole fractions: \(c_A+c_B+c_C=1\). The initial matrix has \(c_B=0.10\) and \(c_C=0.09\); the initial nuclei have \(c_B=0.05\) and \(c_C=0.87\).

The component mobilities, which determine transport rates, are \(M_A=M_B=1\) and \(M_C=0.1\), in nondimensional model units. The dimensionless misfit strains relative to the α matrix are \((\epsilon_{\alpha\beta},\epsilon_{\alpha\gamma})=(0.010, 0.010)\).

The Zener anisotropy ratio is \(A_z=1\). It is defined by \(A_z=2C_{44}/(C_{11}-C_{12})\), where \(C_{11},C_{12},C_{44}\) are cubic elastic stiffness constants. \(A_z=1\) gives isotropic elasticity.

Sandeep’s ternary-alloy presentation · Open movie
Growth at higher matrix solute content. The initial B mole fraction in the matrix is increased from 0.10 to 0.15. The other listed parameters are unchanged from the first movie.
Simulation parameters

Composition is expressed as dimensionless mole fractions: \(c_A+c_B+c_C=1\). The initial matrix has \(c_B=0.15\) and \(c_C=0.09\); the initial nuclei have \(c_B=0.05\) and \(c_C=0.87\).

The component mobilities, which determine transport rates, are \(M_A=M_B=1\) and \(M_C=0.1\), in nondimensional model units. The dimensionless misfit strains relative to the α matrix are \((\epsilon_{\alpha\beta},\epsilon_{\alpha\gamma})=(0.010, 0.010)\).

The Zener anisotropy ratio is \(A_z=1\). It is defined by \(A_z=2C_{44}/(C_{11}-C_{12})\), where \(C_{11},C_{12},C_{44}\) are cubic elastic stiffness constants. \(A_z=1\) gives isotropic elasticity.

Sandeep’s ternary-alloy presentation · Open movie
Growth with anisotropic elasticity. The core-shell precipitates develop flatter sides. This example also uses different misfit strains and component mobilities, so the change in shape cannot be attributed to anisotropy alone.
Simulation parameters

Composition is expressed as dimensionless mole fractions: \(c_A+c_B+c_C=1\). The initial matrix has \(c_B=0.10\) and \(c_C=0.09\); the initial nuclei have \(c_B=0.05\) and \(c_C=0.87\).

The component mobilities, which determine transport rates, are \(M_A=M_B=1\) and \(M_C=1\), in nondimensional model units. The dimensionless misfit strains relative to the α matrix are \((\epsilon_{\alpha\beta},\epsilon_{\alpha\gamma})=(0.006, 0.012)\).

The Zener anisotropy ratio is \(A_z=3\). It is defined by \(A_z=2C_{44}/(C_{11}-C_{12})\), where \(C_{11},C_{12},C_{44}\) are cubic elastic stiffness constants. \(A_z=1\) gives isotropic elasticity.

Sandeep’s ternary-alloy presentation · Open movie

Tushar Jogi — evolution and deformation in Ni-base superalloys

Computational Modeling and Simulations of Process–Microstructure–Property Relations in Model Ni-base Superalloys.

Tushar and I studied how dislocations move and form networks at precipitate interfaces during high-temperature creep. In this work, Tushar extended the three-dimensional discrete dislocation dynamics code ParaDiS to include precipitates. We examined the effects of applied stress, precipitate spacing, glide and climb. Our dislocation-network paper gives the results. OpenDiS, developed by Wei Cai and the OpenDiS team, now provides an open-source framework in which we can adapt and share our precipitate module. Our later phase-field study examines precipitate splitting in Ni-base superalloys.

Dislocations and creep

Dislocations are line defects in a crystal. Glide moves a dislocation within its slip plane; climb moves it out of that plane through the absorption or emission of point defects. Creep is deformation that develops with time under an applied load.

Atchyut, one of my current PhD students, extended the splitting code to multiple GPUs and processors for very large-scale simulations. He is studying multiparticle splitting, elastic inhomogeneity and directional coarsening (rafting). We will add new results as they become available.

Elastic inhomogeneity and rafting

Elastic inhomogeneity means that the matrix and precipitates have different elastic constants. Rafting is directional coarsening: precipitates develop extended arrangements under the combined effects of elastic stresses and an applied load.

Formation of an interfacial dislocation network. Yellow lines show dislocations moving around the blue precipitates and forming a network at their interfaces. Play the movie to follow how the network develops.Discrete dislocation dynamics study · Open movie
Precipitate splitting in three dimensions. The cyan surface shows the precipitate boundary. Narrow connections develop and separate, producing several precipitates. Play the movie to see the sequence rather than only its final shape.Phase-field study of precipitate splitting · Open movie

Soumya Bandyopadhyay — ferroelectric domain evolution and switching

A Phase-Field Study of Electromechanical Effects on Domain Evolution and Polarization Switching in Bulk, Thin-film and Multilayer Ferroelectric Perovskite Oxides.

Soumya and I, in collaboration with Ranjith Ramadurai, studied how electrical and mechanical conditions affect ferroelectric domain structures and polarization switching. Ranjith has been a collaborator in my ferroelectrics work. A domain is a region with a particular polarization direction. The models couple polarization, strain and electric fields. Related paper: thermodynamic analysis and phase-field simulations of electrostriction and domain switching.

Three rows compare BFO thin-film domains: experimental out-of-plane PFM images in the left column, in-plane PFM images in the middle, and phase-field simulations on the right. Rows show tetragonal-like, mixed-phase and rhombohedral films.
BFO thin films: experiment and simulation. BFO is bismuth ferrite, BiFeO3. The left and middle columns are experimental out-of-plane and in-plane images from piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM), which measures the local electromechanical response. The right column shows simulated domain patterns under the corresponding strain conditions. From top to bottom, the rows show tetragonal-like, mixed tetragonal–rhombohedral, and rhombohedral films. The experimental scale bars are 100 nm, and the PFM phase color bars are in degrees. Simulation colors identify polarization directions using the legends beside each panel; they do not represent the PFM phase signal.Soumya’s thesis, Fig. 5.16, p. 87. Related BFO thin-film study, Journal of Applied Physics (2019). Select the image to view it at full size.
Polarization switching and domain evolution in a BFO thin film. The red point on the left follows the polarization–voltage loop as the applied potential changes. The simulated domain pattern on the right changes along the same switching path. Different colors distinguish domains with different polarization directions. Potential is measured in volts (V); the original movie does not specify the unit on its polarization axis.BFO thin-film study · Open movie

P. Pankaj — morphology development in bimetallic nanoparticles

Morphology Development in Bimetallic Nanoparticles: A Phase Field Study.

Pankaj, Subhradeep and I studied how phase separation, surface preference and diffusion produce core-shell and Janus morphologies. In a Janus particle, the two phases occupy adjacent regions. We used an embedded phase-field model to describe the particle and its surroundings. Related papers: competition between core-shell and Janus morphologies and surface-directed and bulk spinodal decomposition.

Two sequences of composition patterns inside a circular particle: the top row forms a core-shell structure and the bottom row forms a Janus structure.
Core-shell and Janus formation. Time increases from left to right. The top row forms a core-shell particle; the bottom row forms a Janus particle. Blue and green distinguish the two compositions; the initial gray particle has a nearly uniform composition. The displayed times are dimensionless, and the two rows use different model parameters.Pankaj’s thesis, Fig. 5.1, p. 57. Select the image to view it at full size.

The movies rotate the final Janus structures through 360° to show the internal interface and particle surface. This is a change in viewing direction, not further simulated evolution.

Particle size and surface-energy parameters

The particle diameter is \(d=140\) in dimensionless model units. The dimensionless parameter \(\chi\) controls the composition dependence of surface energy: \(\chi=0\) gives equal surface energies for the two phases, while \(\chi=0.25\) gives different surface energies.

Janus particle: \(\chi=0\). The two phases have equal surface energies, and their internal interface is approximately planar. Yellow and turquoise identify the two separated phases.Acta Materialia (2022), Fig. 5 and supplementary material · Open movie
Janus particle: \(\chi=0.25\). The surface-energy difference gives a curved internal interface. Yellow and turquoise identify the two separated phases.Acta Materialia (2022), Fig. 5 and supplementary material · Open movie
The embedded-model idea

I use a dimensionless auxiliary field \(\phi\) to distinguish a particle from its surroundings. The smooth function \(h(\phi)\) changes from zero outside to one inside; \(1-h(\phi)\) and \(h(\phi)\) weight the exterior and particle free energies. Sandeep and I studied core-shell precipitation with a coupled composition–structural-field model before the later nanoparticle studies with Pankaj. I developed the embedded-particle model and original CPU code; Pankaj developed the GPU implementation from that code. The GitHub repository provides the equations, Julia code and run instructions.

Development of my auxiliary-variable and embedded models

This work builds on my earlier development of auxiliary-variable models. In my PRL work on hierarchical phase-separating structures (2006), I used the composition \(c_A\) as an auxiliary variable in a ternary model. Here, \(c_A\), \(c_B\) and \(c_C\) are dimensionless mole fractions, with \(c_A+c_B+c_C=1\).

In my PCCP work on lithium intercalation in a nanoparticle (2016), I introduced a separate dimensionless field \(\phi\) to describe the particle domain and used it to impose boundary conditions in a spectral smoothed-boundary model.

Before the nanoparticle studies with Pankaj, Sandeep and I developed a coupled composition–structural-field model and studied core-shell precipitation in ternary alloys. The structural field distinguishes the disordered matrix from the ordered precipitates, while composition distinguishes the two precipitate phases. We examined how interfacial energies and lattice misfits affect the formation and stability of core-shell structures. This work appears in Sandeep’s thesis and our MRS Advances paper (2019).

The later fixed-particle implementation differs from the evolving structural field used in the earlier coupled model. The embedded-model explanation gives the equations, and the model history gives the earlier references and the distinctions between implementations.

Alloys & superalloysFerroelectric oxidesPhase separation

Theses and related papers

Examples and source codes

My NRCM phase-field workshop examples explain spinodal decomposition and precipitate growth using conserved composition and an evolving structural field. The page includes my original C sources and input files.

ELASTIC STRESS EFFECTS

Elastic Stress Effects.

I study how lattice misfit, elastic anisotropy and differences in elastic constants affect phase separation and precipitate shape. I also develop Fourier-based methods for calculating stress and elastic energy in heterogeneous materials. The laboratory and derivation pages explain the equations and provide calculations you can explore.

Elastic stress effects: studies, papers and derivations

My work examines elastic stress effects on microstructural evolution, including anisotropic misfit, elastic anisotropy and elastic inhomogeneity. We develop phase-field models and FFT-based microelasticity solvers to study the coupling between evolving microstructures and mechanical fields.

Anisotropic misfitElastic stress effectsFFT microelasticityDislocation dynamicsCrystal plasticity

Applications include elastic stress effects on phase separation in ternary alloys, multivariant microstructures with anisotropic misfit, and stress effects on grain boundary migration. Related work connects discrete dislocation dynamics and crystal plasticity with strengthening and deformation in heterogeneous materials.

Questions we investigate

  • How do anisotropic misfit and elastic interactions influence microstructural morphology and variant evolution?
  • How do elastic anisotropy and inhomogeneity affect phase separation in alloys?
  • How can spectral methods resolve mechanical fields in heterogeneous microstructures?

Selected publications behind these questions

Elastic stress effects form a continuing research direction across our models, solvers and materials applications. The same physical questions run through our studies of multivariant microstructures, ternary phase separation, coherent precipitate interactions, Ni-base superalloys and ferroic materials.

In Ni-base superalloys, we examine how lattice misfit, applied stress, elastic anisotropy and elastic inhomogeneity influence precipitate morphology, splitting, directional coarsening or rafting, and long-time microstructural stability. Our related Intermetallics study of γ′ coarsening in Inconel 740H connects this broader superalloy program with CALPHAD-informed phase-field modeling and GPU computation.

This thread also continues through our FFT-based homogeneous and inhomogeneous elasticity solvers, current elasto-viscoplastic superalloy work, classroom notebooks, the Elastic Stress Effects Laboratory, and high-performance phase-field development alongside MicroSim.

Elastic energy and driving-force derivations

Starting from mechanical equilibrium, the derivation constructs the Fourier-space elastic-energy kernel and then obtains the variational derivatives that drive composition and structural order-parameter evolution. The formulation begins with Eshelby’s inclusion construction and Mura’s eigenstrain method. The homogeneous elastic-energy kernel then follows Khachaturyan’s Chapter 7 treatment of arbitrary multiphase alloys and coherent-inclusion interactions. Our Communications in Computational Physics paper supplies the separate reference-medium iteration for elastically inhomogeneous systems. My thesis appendices remain available as one detailed multivariant derivation.

Study the Fourier-space kernel and driving-force derivations →
PHYSICS-INFORMED NEURAL NETWORKS

PINN Inverse Modeling.

Learn the idea step by step: interactive PINN introduction →

I develop numerical inverse methods using physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and multiobjective optimization to extract diffusion coefficients and mobility data in multicomponent alloys from experimental diffusion profiles.

This research is carried out in collaboration with Prof. Aloke Paul’s group at the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), Bengaluru. His group leads the experimental diffusion studies and measurements, while my group at IIT Hyderabad develops the PINN and numerical inverse-modeling methods.

Together, we connect experimental evidence with governing transport equations to infer composition-dependent diffusion coefficients and mobility data. Applications include pseudo-binary diffusion couples and multicomponent NiCoFeCr and NiCoFeCrMn alloys.

The inverse problem can be posed as multiobjective optimization: fit the experimental profiles while satisfying transport equations and conditions, and use independent diffusivity data where available.

PINNsInverse diffusion problemsMobility dataMultiobjective optimization
Explore diffusion and PINN publications →
SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING

Computational methods and software.

My group develops GPU-accelerated phase-field solvers and parallel numerical methods. The IITH contribution to MicroSim includes CUDA-based modules such as KKS-CuFFT and KKS-FD-CUDA-MPI.

We also investigate machine-learning approaches to accelerate physics-based models of microstructural evolution.

CUDA · MPI · FFTInverse problemsPhysics-informed learning
Three-dimensional plate formation. This KKS-CuFFT simulation uses a 512 × 512 × 512 grid. The precipitates develop extended plates as the microstructure evolves. The color bar labeled beta shows the dimensionless precipitate-phase field: zero identifies matrix and one identifies precipitate.KKS-CuFFT workshop presentation, slide 28 · Open movie
Evolution with anisotropic misfit. The normal misfit strains are \(\epsilon_{xx}=0\) and \(\epsilon_{yy}=\epsilon_{zz}=0.01\). These dimensionless strains describe the stress-free change in length along each coordinate direction; 0.01 is a one-percent change. The precipitates develop elongated shapes. The beta color scale again identifies the precipitate phase.KKS-CuFFT workshop presentation, slide 29 · Open movie
Explore MicroSim on GitHub ↗
COLLABORATIVE WORK

Across research and industry.

My projects include work supported by General Electric, Tata Steel, DMRL, MIDHANI, DST-SERB, the National Supercomputing Mission and ARDB. These span strengthening, steel transformations, superalloy processing, functional oxides and computational materials design.

See selected projects and experience →